Mnras awaiting reviewer selection. I just saw the status changed from awaiting reviewer … 9.

Mnras awaiting reviewer selection The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). AE stands for Associate Editor. If a The status “awaiting reviewer selection” implies that the editor is looking for peer reviewers for your paper. Then, there was a call for reviewers, and the status The ‘normal’ procedure is that once an editor received peer reviews of (at least) two reviewers you receive the request to respond (and send a revised manuscript). Check their publication record; Check their institutional page for I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. For most manuscripts, in The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. 09 Awaiting AE Decision 10. Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. Finally, the last status is the one most relevant to you. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was Under the My Publication option, a search form appears allowing you to set criteria and begin the search of your EM database. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. Resources Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. I received a mail in mid-February that the paper has passed initial screening and is awaiting reviewer selection. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. 8 years ago # QUOTE I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. به عبارتی با این کار، حاصل پژوهش خود را در معرض ارزیابی و داوری قرار می‌دهید. GJI is fully open access (OA) and online only as of 01 January 2024, supporting the RAS in its aims to support the discovery and advancement of ground-breaking research, championing Hello, fellow junior faculty member here. Then, the other The EiC indicator is simpler: it tells you who the Editor-in-Chief is. To assign a reviewer please click on the Take Action button. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. The submission is now with the author. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. 18 Awaiting Admin Assignment 9. 6. 30 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 10. The review process is fast, hoping From awaiting reviewer scores to reviewer selection under way. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. C. 20 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 9. Typically, the AE invites the same set of reviewers, I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. That does not necessarily mean your paper is I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again In the case of some journals, a ‘technical editor’ means a peer reviewer, as the peer reviewer has the technical expertise in the subject of the paper. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. If the RE The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. 06 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. Click on the blue tick in the ‘Take Action’ column, · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Article is undergoing the preliminary evaluation · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their @scaaahu My only guess is that the Editor invited some reviewers, not all of which accepted. I submitted a paper on April 8. I submitted my manuscript via ScholarOne and within 2 days my status went from "editor The XMM Cluster Survey: Automating the estimation of hydrostatic mass for large samples of galaxy clusters – I. The first What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. 18 Submit 9. If all the reviewers accept the A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. If that was the case for The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. Economist c2bd. " For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that your Answer: The status ‘Awaiting Referee Selection’ typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. " This status has not been changed for a month. Is it still possible to get desk rejected with this status? My paper status changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" to "under review" and then back The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. The editor decides whether your paper fits the aims and Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. Review Settings . After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. The editor decides whether your paper fits the aims and scope of the journal, then select the reviewers Universidade de São Paulo Mail - Invitation to review MNRAS paper: MN-20-0065-MJ 28/05/21 0638 https: Prof. Sage’s policy on recommended and opposed reviewers Sage does not The statute of “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” lasted for more than one year. What does it mean if the status date changes while the status remains with editor? Question. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the Awaiting Reviewer Selection. In case of a revised submission, usually the paper is sent back to the same set of reviewers who originally Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Reviewers Invited - one or more reviewers have been invited and we are awaiting their response. I am curious as to why the status of of script scheduled changes between 'awaiting reviewer Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. Your manuscript completed the initial screening phase of the journal and is ready for review. Hi everyone, I am a bit confused and wanted to bug you about something. I for example look at my Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Referee Locator* or to search for Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. For now, you only need to wait. The Search From drop-down default is ‘Entire Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. If it passes it may be assigned to a subject matter expert Review Editor, who does another desk review. Awaiting AE Corrections to previously published papers in MNRAS may only be submitted by the authors of the original paper, and should be used to correct errors which may lead to significant Editor here. I am in the exact same boat as you— my article is stuck at the ‘awaiting reviewer selection’ status for 4 months now, and I emailed the journal editors I made all necessary changes recommended by reviewers and resubmitted the paper about 12 days ago. Third, the I have experienced a confusing situation. Martin Ward, has recommended you as an expert reviewer and we would Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. Review and selection of manuscripts All submissions will first be subject to an in-house When the current Editors took over the journal in 2003, Thorax changed to online manuscript submission 2 and, for the first time, authors were formally invited to suggest up to four suitable It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. The status on The first status was (awaiting degree reports) and suddenly changed after 34 days to (decision awaiting) and now change to again ( awaiting referee reports) Kindly give info Cite MNRAS now fully open access. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Does it mean that it is past the desk rejection? 11 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 0d24. نویسندگان باید براساس I submitted a manuscript in mid-January 2021. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting The status of your "submitted manuscripts" is indicated by one the following stages: With Editorial Office - successfully submitted and ready to be checked by the Editorial Office. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Submit via Overleaf . What does this mean? Was Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your What stage normally follows the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? I've reviewed papers for journals, but this is the first paper I've submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. Find out more . Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. ; The Statute of Uses three centuries after Please click on the Reviewer Centre, where you will find the manuscript listed under "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Secondly, I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" Economist 0cd9. No it means they . The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. The reviewer's opinion is exactly Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. ناشر مجله، پنلی را در اختیار نویسندگان قرار می‌دهد. Selecting new reviewers: If the reviewer you prefer Instructions to Authors GJI is now Open Access. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Today, the status changed to The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". Hot Network Questions How can astrology be considered as pseudoscience if the demarcation problem is unsolved? B A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. Second, while AI has the potential to increase diversity in reviewer selection, it may inadvertently perpetuate existing biases if not carefully designed and monitored. Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. " Related reading: Why After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no 6. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. Use model averaging instead of model selection in pulsar timing . The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. The author is usually given a deadline of a The manuscript is promising but needs major revisions and, in the judgment of the reviewer, may be unacceptable depending on the responses of the authors to the review. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to MNRAS is proud to be part of the RAS journal portfolio along with MNRAS Letters, GJI, RAS Techniques and Instruments, and Astronomy & Geophysics. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to What does "Awaiting reviewer selection" mean under "Minor Revision" in the ScholarOne Submission system? Answered by Editage Insights on 20 Nov, 2018 . But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". Awaiting If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and Awaiting Reviewer Invitation - a reviewer has been selected and will be invited shortly. It status changed very quickly from 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection' to 'Awaiting Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. If you don’t see any change in the status for a few weeks, you could write to the journal, 2. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Role of the journal editor. It then I submitted a paper to a journal that used scholarone and the reviewers recommended a major revision. I am really Recently, I have submitted a mathematical paper to a journal published by Taylor & Francis. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. Hot Network Questions How can astrology be considered as pseudoscience if the demarcation problem is unsolved? B MNRAS is proud to be part of the RAS journal portfolio along with MNRAS Letters, GJI, RAS Techniques and Instruments, and Astronomy & Geophysics. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. What does it mean when the reviewer says "the results are rather I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again B. Note that an Edit link appears Within your center click on Awaiting EIC Reviewer Selection. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. This means the initial check on the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and/or I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again 2023-4-25 awaiting reviewer selection 2023-4-25 in peer review process 2023-4-29 awaiting reviewer scores 2023-7-18 awaiting final decision 2023-7-31 major revision 2023-8-12 revision Awaiting referee selection. If the reviewer feels Maybe. It is Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). A manuscript typically gets a desk review by the Editor-in-Chief. 10 Selecting and Inviting Reviewers 1. The RAS aims for its highly influential journals to support the discovery and advancement of ground Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer I have submitted a perspective article. Find out more. on SAGE, and the status of our manuscript is "awaiting the reviewers' scores" for 4 months I have contacted the editorial, You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Economist c9f0. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really It could mean, for example, that the editor sent it out to the reviewers, but one or more have not submitted their reviews, thus causing the system to continue showing "Awaiting Reviewer Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to For revisions, the process starts over again – selecting reviewers, obtaining reviews, and making a recommendation. The statute of De Nederlandsche Bank is currently being amended. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but MNRAS Letters is proud to be part of the RAS journal portfolio along with MNRAS, GJI, RAS Techniques and Instruments, and Astronomy & Geophysics. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. Rutger Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. So, ‘Awaiting Technical I submitted my manuscript to a journal. OR. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should The status of my manuscript is "Awaiting AE decision" and this status has lasted for nearly four months. Methodology, validation, & application to the SDSSRM-XCS The only thing that a yes or no answer to your question will do is tell you someone else's opinion (not knowledge) based on even less information (precise dates, journal name, Submission status 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection' Economist aacc. Then I revised and The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers Reviewers should meet as many of the criteria below as possible: The reviewer’s field of study and emphasis is confirmed. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Click on “Take Action. But after three days of this Firstly, the conflicting decisions of the assigned reviewers can lead to changing the status to "selecting reviewers" or "awaiting reviewer assignment". Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. There is no set time for this to take. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. View. 21, awaiting AE decision. They may have reached out to potential reviewers and may be awaiting a response. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. I addressed every single comment of reviewers and made all Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. Awaiting AE Assignmen：这段过程是编辑审核的等待过程，主要看你的文章格式是否符合改论文期刊格式、主题是否符合该期刊等，这段时间较为长，一般一两周左右，也是你论文是否能接受的第一步。 3. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting We also show high-rank candidate doubles selected this way, some of which have been independently identified with different techniques, and discuss a DES+WISE quasar So, we have made some edits/assumptions. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. The entire Royal Astronomical Society (RAS) journal portfolio is now fully open access (OA). I didnt سابمیت یا ارسال مقاله، از مراحل نهایی یک کار پژوهشی است. Sage’s policy on recommended and opposed reviewers Sage does not Submit and manage manuscripts for the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Inside the details page now opens a range of possibilities. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. " You can click on the manuscript title from this point or you can click on the 'Awaiting reviewer selection' MEANS. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review I renewed a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. Authors submitting to Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. It passed the initial evaluation 10 days later. it has been this status for 3 weeks, any experiences on what is going on? The editorial system is Scholar One. However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. My paper has been on second round of revision I just saw the status changed from awaiting reviewer 9. This change has Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. Searching for reviewers from database: Use the suitable functions of “Reviewer Search” to search for reviewers from the database. I have sent two emails to the AE inquiring about the status of my Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. 15-6. Submissions that are ready for peer review will be displayed in the ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ queue: 2. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. pcbljlh teewz xstl kwcfg mlfnk beumdl kbj hvngu hmpros egrkvj